Interactive Sanctuary Jurisdiction 2024 Map

Foreign invaders do not seek sanctuary; they seek destabilization, destruction and conquest.

When lawless jurisdictions exist in our country at the behest of public functionaries who have been granted limited delegated authority (duty), these men and women, by offering sanctuary to foreign invaders, are violating their sacred oath of office to protect and defend our constitutional rule of law and are committing acts of treason against the United States of America. Can the truth be any clearer?

The word “law” is used loosely here, because it is difficult to ascertain what “the law” is when our public functionaries churn out “new laws” virtually at warp speed on a daily basis without providing any constitutional basis for these acts and actions. That is the status of where we find ourselves today: We don’t really know what “the law” is, and we have “lawmakers” who make “the law” as they relentlessly ignore “the law.”

Then, in gargantuan efforts to appease us, they deceive us by “attempting” to make “corrections” to bad law by creating more bad law when the only function that they have been elected or appointed to accomplish for the public is to secure our rights while staying within their limited delegated authority (duty). The Law was always only instituted to secure our rights, not to trample on every aspect of our daily lives.

For example, see an article posted to Judicial Watch on November 27, 2024 entitled “After Releasing Hundreds of Alien Criminals State Passes Law to Honor ICE Detainers.” The ‘bill’ that this article claims will “end the madness” is North Carolina’s HB10. The relevant section is "§ 162-62. Legal status of prisoners which reads in part:

(a) When any person charged with a felony or an impaired driving offense is confined for any period in a county jail, local confinement facility, district confinement facility, or satellite jail/work release unit, satellite jail, or work release unit, the administrator or other person in charge of the facility shall attempt to determine if the prisoner is a legal resident of the United States by an inquiry of the prisoner, or by examination of any relevant documents, or both, if the person is charged with any of the following offenses: (1) A felony under G.S. 90-95. (2) A felony under Article 6, Article 7B, Article 10, Article 10A, or Article 13A of Chapter 14 of the General Statutes. (3) A Class A1 misdemeanor or felony under Article 8 of Chapter 14 of the General Statutes. (4) Any violation of G.S. 50B-4.1 (bolding mine).

What happens if “the administrator” is a deep state hireling who isn’t really interested in “attempting” to determine legal residency of the prisoner? What if “the prisoner” upon inquiry says “Sí, soy residente legal” or “Yes, I am a legal resident?” What if there aren’t any “documents?”

If we are to “trust” the law, shouldn’t we be able to “verify” compliance with the law and then enforce remedy if the law isn’t being followed? Am I asking for too much here?

Then check out one of the many Executive Orders that Usurper Joe issued on day one of his being installed in the White House. This one’s called “Executive Order on the Revision of Civil Immigration Enforcement Policies and Priorities” and it is designed to “safeguard the dignity and well-being of all families and communities.” I don’t remember seeing the words “dignity” or “well-being” in the limited delegated authorities (duties) granted to The Executive.

Biden’s Executive Order reversed the Executive Order that President Trump issued in the first week of his first Presidential term entitled Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States that was designed to clarify “the laws” regarding Immigration Policies.

NOTE: The problem with “The Executive Department” using “The Executive Order” to make policy recommendations is that these “Orders” are immediately reversed with a different pen and a different piece of paper during a different Administration. Maybe The Executive should help The People teach The Congress what “lawmaking” functions are enshrined in their limited delegated authorities (duties).

Now, Georgia’s Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene wants to withhold federal funding provided to sanctuary jurisdictions which means more paper, more pens, more words, more bills that might or might not become "more laws" and more broken promises that will keep us all running on The Hamster Wheel of Injustice, especially once the attorneys get their well-greased feet onto the Wheel.

What I humbly suggest is that we declare what we all already know to be true and that is that sanctuary jurisdictions are unconstitutional, then cite constitutionally-sound “laws” as expressed in Norton vs Shelby County TN 118 US 425 (1886) which states that “An unconstitutional act confers no rights; it imposes no duties; it affords no protection to any "public functionaries" who have acted as "usurpers" and violated the United States Constitution and/or their State Constitution and/or local Charter and can be removed from office having committed such acts.”

That reads: REMOVED FROM OFFICE … without new laws, without withholding federal funds, without anything except the COURAGE of our State legislative public functionaries who are DUTY BOUND to uphold the Constitution (and laws made in pursuance thereof), doing the function that We the People granted them the authority (duty) to perform.

By the way, under Article I Section 8 of the United States Constitution, one of the enumerated powers of Congress is …

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions (bolding mine).

But wait, isn’t Congress currently operating like a sanctuary jurisdiction itself by usurping their limited delegated duties?

This madness will continue until We the People get a workable understanding of the Constitution that can cause even the wrong people to do the right thing.

Join the Magnificent Republic as we work diligently to do just that.