Democracy vs a Constitutional Republic: Ayn Rand's Case
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE NEED TO INFORM OUR PUBLIC FUNCTIONARIES OF THE LIMITS TO THEIR PROPERLY DELEGATED DUTIES.
Use this excellent presentation by Ayn Rand as a tool to do just that!
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE NEED TO INFORM OUR PUBLIC FUNCTIONARIES OF THE LIMITS TO THEIR PROPERLY DELEGATED DUTIES.
Use this excellent presentation by Ayn Rand as a tool to do just that!
It brings me no joy to challenge such a highly-respected, well-positioned and intelligent man like Newt Gingrich; however his incorrectly calling President Donald J. Trump “The De Facto President” is of such consequence to the American People’s Understanding of the MAGNIFICENT REPUBLIC that has been given to us, that I feel compelled to do so.
President Trump is the De Jure President-Elect. That is because he was duly elected to the De Jure Office of the Presidency on November 5, 2024.
Usurper Joe was, is and will always be the De Facto President. That is because he was illegally installed into the Office of the Presidency, not elected.
As a consequence of there being so much irrefutable evidence that the 2020 Presidential Election was stolen, the State election tallies should never have been certified by Congress on January 6, 2021.
In fact, that certification should be reversed even still to this day (fraud vitiates everything which, in legal terms means that fraud voids out or cancels everything and there is no statue of limitation on fraud) See Section 11 of US v Throckmorton 98 US 61. 25 L. Ed. 93, 98 US 61 (October Term, 1878).
My sincerest prayer is that Newt Gingrich will read the article entitled Why Should We Care About Norton v Shelby County where he will find a link to the lynch pin case Norton v Shelby County, TN 118 US 425 (1886) so that he himself can read how a unanimous (9-0) Supreme Court decision of 1886 is so critical to our understanding the terms of our Republic including De Jure and De Facto.